At last night's National Spelling Bee, 13-year-old Sameer Mishra provided some comic relief when he misheard the word "numnah":
For those who don't know, "numnah" is a type of sheepskin pad. When Mishra was presented with that word, he initially thought the pronouncer said "numbnut," an insult best known from the movie Full Metal Jacket, when Sargent Hartman yells at Private Pyle, "What is your major malfunction, numbnut?"
Mishra shook off any embarrassment and ended up winning the bee by correctly spelling "guerdon."
Tony Kornheiser announced on his radio show this morning that he has accepted a buyout from the Washington Post, effectively retiring him as a newspaper writer/worker.
Kornheiser has been at the Post since 1979 and for a pair of generations -- ours and our parents -- is probably considered the most important sports journalism voice from the Capitol area. Kornheiser sounded (as transcribed by Dan Steinberg) melancholy about his departure.
"All I ever wanted to be was a newspaper writer," he said, which is likely not something that anyone under the age of 30 will ever say again. "This other stuff is great, but I don't care about it," he continued. "In my mind that's what it says on the headstone, it says 'newspaper guy.' "
But he also said he signed the papers to take the Post's buyout last night, after working here for, I believe, 29 years. He said he still might contract with The Post to do his Talking Points videos and his Page 2 excerpts, and he said some people in the leadership asked him to stay but didn't really insist, and even though he'll keep doing PTI and the radio show and MNF, he said he feared he'd never have the moral high ground again.
Wow. I know that last sentence is not word-for-word from Tony's mouth, but what does that say about his relationship with ESPN? Lacks moral high ground but involves a ton of money? Maybe. If that's the case, and I sense that plugging every ABC/Disney product in sight is not his idea of "moral high ground", then it's kind of sad to think that Kornheiser will eventually be known for that work and not his WaPo writing.
Here's an issue where I agree with Washington Post columnist and best-selling author Sally Jenkins: We both believe Marion Jones got a raw deal in the Balco investigation. Here's where I take issue with her: Jenkins has written a column that ignores key facts while somehow managing to conflate Jones with the Mitchell investigation, which, in case this isn't obvious, has nothing to do with track and field.
I would recommend Jenkins' column for any journalism teacher looking for an example of how a writer can simply ignore facts that aren't convenient to his or her hypothesis. Jenkins believes the fact that Jones is facing prison time for the Balco case shows a racial double standard: Whites who did the same thing Jones did aren't facing prison time, that's Jenkins' basic point.
So what does Jenkins have to say about the fact that the three people who have gone to prison for Balco are white? Nothing. She simply ignores that fact. Read the whole column, and notice the names "Victor Conte," "Patrick Arnold" and "Greg Anderson" don't appear anywhere. I guess it could have damaged her thesis that the Balco investigation is fueled by racism if she had bothered to mention Conte, Arnold and Anderson.
I feel badly for Marion Jones. I'd prefer not to have my tax dollars going toward investigating and imprisoning her. But I'm not going to claim that she's been treated worse than white people in the same situation, because she hasn't.
It's a question that has vexed male tennis fans for years now: If you had a choice, who would you choose, Anna Kournikova or Maria Sharapova?
And what a choice it is. Which is why I decided to ask newly minted professional tennis player, John Isner, who fought all the way to the Finals of the Legg Mason Tennis Classic before falling to Andy Roddick, who he would choose.
As you'll see, it's a question the young man struggled with. And to tell you the truth, who wouldn't?
Excellent choice. And very defensible. Especially when you take the height question into consideration.
I've spent all weekend at the Legg Mason Tennis Classic in Washington, DC, and while the rest of the world is enjoying a sleepy Summer weekend, the rest of us here may very well be witnessing the birth of the next great career in American tennis.
The story of the week has been John Isner, a wild card entry to the tournament who spent four years playing at the University of Georgia while far more celebrated talents worked their way to the ATP tour via high-priced tennis academies.
All Isner has done here in Washington is rip through the field, defeating more celebrated names like Tim Henman, Tommy Haas and finally last night, the incredibly athletic Gael Monfils. He's done it all with a booming serve unlike any on the tour today, one that his most recent victim, Monfils, last night called one of the best on the tour.
I want to say something before we get started. This is all about judging the most popular and relevant athletes in Washington DC. For those of you who may have forgotten this is a football town, the Redskins dominate the sports landscape for better or worse, depending on your perspective. So let me just apologize in advance to the loyal fans of the Nats and the United.
5. Roy Hibbert: The Magnificent Roy may be young but he's already been on the minds of DC sports fans for a number of years. After rooting against him for four years in high school I've had to learn to love him the same way he had to learn to run when he came to Georgetown (apparently Prep forgot to teach him that). This is going to be the year of Georgetown basketball and Roy will be leading the charge.
4. Alexander Ovechkin: DC isn't a hockey town but the Capitals have maintained a loyal and dedicated fan base despite the NHL's declining popularity in the wake of the recent lockout. It can be argued that Alexander the Great is solely responsible for that anomaly. He's an enigmatic young star at the top of his game and he talks good American. Of course he might be higher on this list if his nicknames weren't so pedestrian.
It's really not a sport and it happened more than a week ago, but we're not done with the National Spelling Bee just yet. Not after seeing this CNN interview with champion Evan O'Dorney, which might be the most awkward three and a half minutes in the history of television:
Much respect must be given to CNN's Kiran Chetry for maintaining her composure while navigating her way through the ordeal.
Correctly spelling "serrefine," a home-schooled California eighth grader named Evan O'Dorney has won the 2007 Scripps National Spelling Bee.
O'Dorney and Nate Gartke advanced to the championship round for a one-on-one spell-off. Gartke got "coryza" wrong, opening the door for O'Dorney to spell "serrefine," which he said he knew as soon as the judge said it.
Commentator Stuart Scott said O'Dorney has a black belt in taekwondo. Gartke is from Canada and lists curling as one of his interests. It's the second year in a row that a Canadian was one of the last two spellers remaining. No Canadian has ever won the National Spelling Bee.
The championship round words spelled correctly before Gartke missed "coryza" were: zoilus vituline pappardelle videlicet yosenabe
By far the most famous winner in the history of the National Spelling Bee is Rebecca Sealfon, the Brooklyn girl who jumped up and down and screamed the letters of "euonym," the word she spelled to win the 1997 title. (The video is still popular on YouTube.)
According to her Wikipedia entry, Sealfon inspired a South Park character, and she has been the butt of a few jokes on the old ESPN Classic show Cheap Seats, as well as on Jim Rome's radio show.
Ten years later, it seems like a good time to catch up with Sealfon, but I'm sorry to say I can't find a whole lot of information about what she's doing now, other than that she's currently a biology graduate student at Duke. Is she still spelling? Will she watch the bee today? Inquiring minds want to know.
As for this year's Bee, the preliminary rounds are over and the championship rounds will air live at 8 p.m. ET on ABC.
In a shocking upset, Scripps National Spelling Bee favorite Samir Patel was eliminated in the fifth round of this morning's competition, keeping the Bee's biggest star out of the prime time championship rounds.
Patel was given the word "clevis," which he spelled "clevice."
In the picture, Patel is being consoled by his father after his elimination from the 2003 bee, when he was 9 years old. He's been back every year since, including a second-place finish and a third-place finish. This year's Bee was his fifth and last, meaning he'll go down in history as perhaps the greatest speller never to win the championship.
As Patel walked off the stage, his fellow spellers gave him a standing ovation as a show of respect for his accomplishments in the competition. There were no tears this year for Patel, who calmly told ESPN's Stuart Scott, "I'm really angry that I got such an easy word wrong."
UPDATE: Patel appealed, saying he should have been given an alternate pronunciation of "clevis," but the appeal was denied. D.C. Sports Bog has an inside look at the appeal.
WHAT IS BACK PORCH? The easy answer: Back Porch exists because FanHouse doesn't have a basement for its bloggers. The bigger picture? BP covers sports news that's funny, off-beat and controversial. In short, it's the other side of sports, covered with an edge. Enjoy.